Carbon 14 dating dinosaur bones
This would certainly be in the interests of scientific truth—especially following the repeated findings of soft tissue in dinosaur bones, and now even seemingly irrefutable DNA in dinosaur specimens.
The public has the right to know the actual chronology of the dinosaurs, and indeed the history of the earth.
But going to the official conference site, the talk has clearly been removed.
(Go to Wednesday, room Leo 2, double-click on BGO2, which is the session that had the presentation.
Regarding why there were no questions on the You Tube presentation – the hotel conference projectionist stopped taping without our knowledge.
Editor, Roberto de Mattei, Edizioni, Cantagalli s.r.l.
There are plenty of dinosaur bones out there that could be tested for C-14—one would hope that other researchers will take up the challenge and perform similar analyses to these researchers.
That is the scientific way to confirm error, as opposed to blatant censorship of data simply because it appears to contradict the established paradigm.
This was a joint event of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS).
It appears that the researchers approached the matter with considerable professionalism, including taking great pains to eliminate contamination with modern carbon as a source of the C signal in the bones.This is an exciting time to be a creationist, both getting this sort of information, and being able to pass it on. Having submitted abstracts, reviewed abstracts, and having served on the committees that decide what papers get into a symposia (something I doubt Dr. The peer review of papers submitted to symposia is not as stringent as that for papers published in journals.